Hear what I’m sayin’

March 21, 2009

A friend of mine tweeted the other day with a link to Comic Quotes – “Good comics invent their own language and boundaries.” He asked the question “Should elearning have the same?” It got me thinking about language, images and my favorite subject, Graphic Communication. Eric replies, “The interplay of text & images in novel way,” got me thinking even further about the juxtaposition of text and images, elearning, and…the speech bubble.

In elearning our collective goal is to communicate our message to a learner with an overall outcome that ultimately changes their behavior to impact performance. If it’s been said, it’s been said a thousand times and we all know that yet we (we = the instructional designers, developers, training managers, and anyone that has any remote capacity in the delivery of elearning) continue to struggle with the how. We read books, attend conferences, share ideas, and always end up in front our own computer with all the latest and greatest tools, access to any resource, and scratch our heads about better ways to communicate. Do I have the one-all-be-all answer? Of course not! What I do have is nothing new – just a new way of thinking about text and images, or the juxtaposition of them.
Read the rest of this entry »


Be Here Now

March 16, 2009

A few months back I was attending a meeting where our company’s VP of HR was addressing us on staying focused. He talked about or strategic focus and how all our department projects roll up into the overall strategy. Same corporate speak I’ve head before, but this time he introduced a phrase; “Be here now.”

He went on to explain that it means to focus ‘here’ and ‘now’ and not to worry about what failures or mistakes we made rather learn from them, and not to worry about deadlines and outcomes rather plan for them.

I just returned from the eLearning Guild’s Annual Gathering and as with every conference I have a full head of info to decipher and a renewed sense of energy…or should I say a ‘focus.’

I was pleasantly rewarded with many great comments from my presentation at AG09 and am humbled at the overall interest. With that, I’m working on an outline to write up more tutorials and articles on visual design and graphic communication. This is my “Be Here Now.”

Here’s a birds-eye view of an outline of upcoming posts: (in no particular order)
1. Reverse Engineer Written Language back into Graphic Language
2. Elements of an Image
3. An Object is First a Shape
4. Effective use of silhouettes in eLearning
5. Building a Reusable Image Library
6. Image types: Difference between .jpg, .gif, .png

That’s a good start, eh?


AutoTutorLite

February 11, 2009

Working in Memphis I am fortunate to be in the same city as the ADL Workforce Co-lab located at the FedEx Institute of Technology on the campus of The University of Memphis. A few years ago the ADL Workforce Co-Lab held its first eLEarning Summit. There were guests and speakers from all over the world, but primarily many of us in from area companies were in attendance.

At the end of the Summit, Dr. Trey Martindale suggested we start a monthly “brown bag lunch” to discuss eLearning in the workforce. From that first lunch it has grown into the Workforce Elearning Resource Network (WERN).

Last week I attended our monthly meeting and thoroughly enjoyed a presentation by Dr. Xiang Hu. He gave us a demonstration of a project they are currently working on with the DoD in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). If you’re not familiar with ITS they can be very expensive and are typically only deployed in the Education, Medical, and Military industries. This presentation demonstrated new technology that is lighter, portable, and can run on any Learning Management System (LMS).

The most interesting thing about this ITS – AutoTutorLite is the Latent Symantic Algorythm. I just learned of it yesterday and am not completely confident I fully understand. Essentially, LSA pulls the “meaning” of a phrase or string of words and generates a dynamic response based on learner’s input. An analogy would be if you type the word “Doctor” in Google, the search engine dynamically builds a search list for you, yet it won’t recognize you may also want to see “Physicians.” From what I understand this is called ‘1st order of co-occurrence.’ 2nd order of co-occurrence would be for example if type the word “House,” it would return words like “Home,” “Kitchen,” “Dining Room” which is where the power of LSA comes in as it ‘thinks’ of what you are really wanting to say. Going even deeper into LSA’s co-occurrences, if I wanted to type “I feel sick” the algorythm would pull the meaning out of my phrase and not only return the words, ‘Doctor’ or ‘Physician’ it can generate a question like “What are your symptoms?” Amazing!

How this applies to Elearning is the ability to script hints and deep level questioning to learner’s responses. A concern was raised regarding spell check and how some learners do not type very well. We were quickly shown an example of a very poorly written sentence with misspellings and the ITS pulled the “meaning” of that phrase and understood what was being entered!

AutoTutorLite was developed from its predecessor AutoTutor to be lighter, portable, and run on any LMS. It’s published in the .swf (Flash) format and depending on the script will be less 300k in size. I can think of several opportunities where this could be used in the workforce and specifically in our industry. It’s more geared toward soft skills than instructional procedural training such as: How to deal with irate customers, Selling skills, Help Desk, Commercial Sales, etc.

Dr. Hu discussed the possibility of conducting a Proof of Concept for this application in the workforce. It may be possible to acquire an intern from his department and in turn deploy this technology on a very small scale to measure the impact.

Again, I’m not that confident that I understand that technology…yet :)


The “Z” effect

February 4, 2009

One of the most challenging questions in the eLearning industry is, “How do I get my learners to comprehend what’s in my course?” More so, “How do I get them to change their behavior that impacts a measurable performance increase?” I don’t know if we’ll ever answer those questions with concrete data, but following certain tips in design we have a better chance of retention.

On this side of the planet, can we agree that in the Western culture we read left to right and top to bottom? For the past couple decades, research has been conducted on how we ‘read’ a computer screen compared to that of a book or newspaper. Jacob Neilsen’s article in April 2006, titled “F-shaped pattern for reading web content” studied the heat maps of user’s eyes across the screen. He notes that a user generally reads (scans) the upper portion of the screen left to right forming the top bar of the “F.” Next, a user will move down to about the center of the screen and read (scan again) left to right, however not as far to the right – forming the second bar of the “F.” Finally, a vertical swoop from top to bottom along the left edge forming the stem of the “F.” Do eLearners read (scan) course modules the same way? I haven’t done the research, but my guess is they do to some extent. I’d like to introduce the “Z-effect” in addition to the “F-Pattern.”

Let’s first talk about why some courses are designed that require a separate training module just to learn how to navigate. The past two decades have already taught people taking eLearning how to navigate a computer screen. We can thank Mr. Gates for putting the “X” in the upper right corner of Windows. The “X” button communicates ‘close’ or ‘exit’, right? So why not capitalize not only on the same iconic graphic but also its location? I get a kick out of seeing eLearning courses with an [exit] button placed at the bottom in the center. Why teach learners to go somewhere other than what they already know about where and how to exit a window? Obviously this is all subjective and every situation dictates the design.

The theory of the “Z-effect” is a user scans the first ‘page’ of your eLearning course in a “Z” pattern. A users first 3 seconds opening your course is the most valuable time you have to get their attention. The “Z-Effect” forces the eye to follow a prescribed path across the screen in sequential pattern that you want learners to see first, second, next, etc. There are many websites that experiment in varying navigation and layouts and are somewhat non-traditional. However, in terms of eLearning it’s pretty straightforward.

Let’s look at a basic design. Where do you want your learner’s eyes to go first? This is up for debate but I like a big image, graphic, cartoon, illustration, etc. placed at just left of center of the screen where there is no question the eye will see it.

Naturally, as Jacob Neilsen also pointed out, a user’s eye will generally go to the top of the screen first. Taking advantage of the natural reading (scanning) patterns this is an opportunity to introduce an image in the upper left corner. Usually it’s the logo of the course or some image that represents the forthcoming training. As with brands and company websites, the traditional location is in the upper left corner so why not eLearning courses? Remember, in this culture we read left to right before going top to bottom, so as the eye travels across the top of the screen as in Neilsen’s “F-Pattern”, the next logical element would be the Title of the course. Now we have an image/logo and supporting text in the form of a title.

As the learner’s eye continues to the right I typically place global navigation icons in this location. This is the absolute best location because Microsoft and the World Wide Web have already “trained” your learners where to go to find these buttons! The Home, Help, About, Contact, Resources, Info, Exit, etc. buttons fit perfectly here. Mac user’s aside, Windows has taught us if we want to close a window, click the X in the upper right corner. Capitalize on that! This forms the top bar of the “Z.” I will point out that the landscape can be used for other elements once the learner enters the course. I like to put the page count in this area also just under the global navigation, but keep it hidden until the learner goes to the next page/screen.

OK, we have their eyes moving across the screen to the right and have landed at or near the exit button. The natural progression would then be down and back to the left. Not in a word-search sort of manner, but in a gradual diagonal pattern back to the left. The trick here is let it! In some cases there may be additional elements, but we only want them to ‘glance’ at them as a visual reference for later retrieval. We want the eye to now hit the main meat of the page to get their attention as we only have a few seconds on this screen. The image, graphic, or illustration they have already registered when first launching the course. The big mistake here is leaving the learner with the question, “What do I do now?” Or, “I don’t get it.” I typically place a small paragraph in a bit larger font in the upper right area of the ‘stage’ just below the global navigation as their first visual stopping point along the path back to the lower left corner. This text is short enough and in a bigger font that a learner can comprehend and retain by simply scanning – not reading.

As the eye swoops back across the screen in the “Z” diagonal pattern to the lower left, it will ‘see’ the image if first registered but this time triggering a memory of it as it passes by and may pause to study it in more detail.

Finally, the eye finds its back to the left and at the bottom working its way across to the right where we’ll end our visual journey of the “Z.” Since this is the bottom and usually the last place the eyes will find, I place instructional text here, such as “Click on the arrow to begin…” Typically, this area is kept completely clean until the eye travels all the way to the right where the directional navigation is found – the Back and Next buttons. Again, I try to keep it simple by taking advantage of what my learners have already been taught. An arrow pointing to the left of the screen suggests going back to the previous page and respectfully, an arrow pointing to the right suggests going forward to the next page. Easy eye flow, and most important retaining the learner’s attention.

In the more eye-catching themes, grab your learner’s attention immediately – with an image! By the time they click the next arrow [button] there will be no confusion as to the content they’ll expect going forward.

Enjoy, and happy designing!


AG|09 – A shape that occupies a space defines an object

December 15, 2008

Let’s take a journey – a journey through space. Not outer space but rather this physical universal space we’re in right now.

Consider for a moment that everything around you is billions of atoms that make up matter, and that matter is countless objects in our everyday life. The chair you’re sitting on, the computer in front of you, the simple cup you drank your morning coffee in is nothing more than matter. All that matter molded, sculpted, fabricated, constructed, etc. are (for the sake of argument) objects.

The idea is to fundamentally consider every object is first a shape that occupies space. That space defines the object by perspective, reflection of light, angle of perception, depth, shadows, color, etc. Every human being as the ability to imagine, and every human being visualizes images in their mind. The only difference is those who are open to learn tips and techniques to get them onto paper.

At AG|09 I’ll demonstrate with a few set of basic shapes and a few tips on perception that anyone can create any ‘object’ to support learning content or communicate a message in your eLearning projects.

I began working on my presentation this weekend. Yeah, I know my wife was a bit worried about me, too seeing as though AG|09 is four months away. Can’t help it…I’m excited and really looking forward to it. I started early because I can give an entire 8 hour workshop on this subject and I have a lot of material to go through.

In the coming weeks and months I’m going to try and explain more of my theory and concept here along with exercises. If you plan on attending AG|09 you’ll get a glimpse of what to expect and if you can’t or don’t plan on attending you won’t miss anything.

We are all in the learning industry in some capacity and we all know that when “The student is ready, the teacher will always appear.” If you’re ready, I’m ready!


AG|09 – an invitation to speak

December 12, 2008

I was recently informed that my submission to eLearning Guild’s Annual Gathering next year has been accepted. Whoohooo!!!

I presented a case study of our LMS implementation at this year’s Meridian Users Conference. I received many comments and it was suggested I submit a proposal to present the same case study at an upcoming industry conference.

Submission proposals for DevLearn were already over, so the next opportunity was the Annual Gathering being held in March ‘09. I submitted two proposals – one case study, but then I got to thinking to myself….”Self, why not speak on something else? Most folks don’t care what you go through, rather they want to learn tips, techniques, and strategies to get them through.” With that thought, I submitted a second proposal on a very simple topic – graphic communication.

We communicate graphically everyday in ways we probably don’t even pay attention to, but all those graphic symbols speak to us. The McDonald’s arches communicate fast food; The Nike swoosh communicates sports, and/or athletic apparel; an upside down white triangle with a red border communicates we need to yield. “See” what I’m saying?

That’s all fine but how does that apply to eLearning? What does a yield sign symbol have to do with a course I’m building in safe lifting practices? We spend thousands of dollars a year on clip art subscriptions, spend thousands on licensing fees for photo usage, or hire an illustrator to draw custom artwork. In this current economic climate, a penny saved is a penny earned.

“The 5th Language” presents just that – the language of graphic communication and how you can capitalize on some very simple yet effective techniques. This post dots, dashes, and lines explains some of these techniques.

More to come…


To Pre-Test or not to Pre-Test

November 6, 2008

There are two schools of thought on this. Adding a Pre Test to gain entry to an on-line course and/or a workshop or not. As well there are as many middle-school thoughts in between. In my experience, here are the top two:

  1. Pre Test is to measure a learner’s current knowledge of the subject prior to taking the class while the Post Test compares the two for the learner to see value in what they just accomplished.
  2. Pre Test is only to measure the developer and/or facilitator and to show stakeholders the value of the course. “See, we have 82% improvement after taking the course.” Where there is no real value to the learner.

I’m on the fence ever time I build a course as I can see merit in both thoughts. In the first example lets say I have a curriculum of 4 courses. The learner must have a fundamental knowledge of the overall subject prior to taking the course along with a few other qualifiers: time with company, time in position, etc. The Pre Test will gauge the learner’s knowledge in that subject. If they pass, the gain access. If they fail, they are given other training in the areas the Pre Test identified as weaknesses. This sort of pre-qualifier ensures those who take the course have the minimum level of knowledge and will contribute as well as comprehend new information. How many times have you attended a course of instruction that clearly outlined prerequisites to then see the instructor spend time teaching the basics to someone that should have not been in that class? I agree with issuing a Pre Test for this type of instruction.

I don’t agree with simply slapping a Pre Test in front of a course, on-line or otherwise, with no strategy. I often hear, “We need a Pre Test so we know how well they did after the course.” They? Or We?

On a middle-school of thought, I do see merit in a Pre Test to gauge how well the questions were formed and how they relate to the content. For example, if 100 learners take a course no one missed question #3. Is that question too easy? Is it a gimme? Or of the 100 learners, everyone missed question #9. Was it too vague? Was it misleading? This information is valuable to the content developers and instructors.

Some middle-school of thoughts are to form the Pre Test and Post Test with different questions. Where the Pre Test questions gauge a learner’s pre-knowledge of the subject – similar to an aptitude test you or I would take that scores us on the knowledge we already know. Where the Post Test questions are geared directly to the ‘new’ content presented in the course.

What’s your take? When is it best to use a Pre Test and when is it of no value?


What eLearning development model?

October 22, 2008

For past two years I’ve been trying to put some kind of eLearning development model into place. Over those same two years my efforts have been thwarted because of the enormously fast-paced environment we live the majority of our days awake. Not that we don’t like processes, we are an extremely flexible and fluid organization and not all development can or will follow a set “project plan” as outlined in the ever so popular ADDIE model…or any other model for that matter.

Well, since we’re fluid and flexible, why not devise a model of the same? Keeping with the theme of our business (ya’know, the whole culture thing) I came up with a simple model. Not only is it easy to identify where you are in the cycle, but it’s a visual (graphic communication plug goes here) representation as well.

Here it is…

 


Life 2.0

July 9, 2008

If you’re at all involved in on-line surfing, blogging, text messaging, or social spaces you’ve heard the term “Web 2.0″ coined by Tim O’Reilly.  I work in the world of eLearning as an LMS Administrator and eLearning development consultant.  I have two digital natives living at home; 19 year old and a 10 year old.  I read blogs, participate in forums, read books, go to conferences and I sitll don’t think anyone really has defined what Web 2.0 really is.

The first assumption when you start putting digits behind something, it usually means a version upgrade.  So Web 2.0 suggests to me there will be a Web 3.0 – or will it be Web 2.5, or Web 2.01 and what will all that mean?  For a sarcastic example lets say Web 3.0 surfaces in another 10 years.  What then?  Will we be coming home after work and putting on our holographic virtual jump suit, turning on the panoramic wall viewers, firing up the ‘box’, putting on our sensory gloves and virtual helmet cam?  Then we immerse ourselves into wherever we want to go before dinner.  ”Have you immersed socially today with Web 3.0?”  I can hear it now.

Seriously, in my work life and my observations at home I see more than just Web 2.0.  I see Life 2.0 emerging into two lives.  My son at 19 is just like any other male teenager.  No dicispline, no direction, full of enthusiasm and spirit, and can’t wait to fly.  Yet, he’s connected beyond what I can keep up with.  He manages two social network sites, three email accounts, plays live video games on two consoles, manages an extensive music library on an iPod and Razr phone and all as it were a way of life.  That’s it!  It IS a way of life.

Life 2.0 is a generation of folks who share 500 text messages in an hour and have full conversations with friends and never actually speak out loud.  Life 2.0 is knowing your entire 2,000+ song library by artist, genre, and title.  Life 2.0 is tagging every last piece of information on your Facebook page whether it has a relevant topic.  Life 2.0 is digital pure and simple.

I’m going to draw a picture of it I think…


Web 2.0 Summer Institute

June 27, 2008

I attended the Web 2.0 Summer Institute hosted by TBR (Tennessee Board of Regions) at the University of Memphis’ FedEx Institute of Technology this week. Due to work constraints I was only able to attend the morning keynote speakers:

  • Barry Dahl – Vice President of Technology and Virtual Campus, Lake Superior College
  • Clarence Maise, Instructional Designer, University of Missouri – St. Louis
  • Michael Grant, Professor of Instructional Design & Technology (ITD), University of Memphis

Although this was more geared toward faculty and the teaching community, I was invited as a guest of the Workforce ADL Co-Lab and was thoroughly pleased with the content and speakers. My focus was to absorb what, if any of the Web 2.0 tools I could use in the workforce…a front line retail associate.

My thoughts were summed up by a phrase Barry said the first day which was quoted by someone I cannot recall, “We have Web 2.0 learners in a Web 1.0 learning environment” or something to that extent. That is so true!

My son not only works at the front line of the same company in which I am developing training for, I get first-hand feedback on how boring our content is, plus I get to see a true Digital Native in pure form.

More later…